Please update your browser. It looks like you are using an old version of the Microsoft Edge browser. To get the best experience with the Pfeiffer website, please update your browser.

7.3 Application notes

Prior to beginning any leak detection process with helium, the user must clarify several fundamental questions:
  • How pressure-resistant is the test specimen?
  • Is there a preferred direction for pressure resistance and can the pressure gradient encountered by the test specimen in actual use be simulated?
  • Is only the location of the leakage to be determined or should it be quantified?
  • Should the integral leak rate of the test specimen be determined? If so, what is the maximum acceptable leak rate?
  • What fluid reference applies for the leak rate indicated?
  • What test pressures does this apply for?
  • Are there any safety aspects to be considered?

On the basis of these answers an appropriate test method can be selected from among the methods indicated in chapters 7.2.4 and 7.2.5.

7.3.1 Leak detection with helium

The leak detector must be calibrated prior to conducting a localizing leak detection or integral leakage test. A helium test leak integrated in the Pfeiffer Vacuum leak detector is used for this purpose. The calibration routine is started either when the leak detector starts up, at the touch of a button or automatically and runs according to a fixed software protocol. Following calibration, the leak detector is ready for use.

The user is kept constantly informed about the status of the unit and the leak rate measured through visual displays and acoustic signals. With the audible signal, the frequency of the signal tone rises as the leakage rate changes. The time at which the acoustic signal is given can be determined by the user by programming a threshold value. Visual signals can be read either on the control panel on the unit concerned or on a wired or wireless remote control unit. This allows leak detection to be carried out by just one person.

The following must always be observed when using helium as the test gas:

  • Helium is lighter than air. So when helium is used in the atmosphere, the leak detection process should always begin at the highest point of the test specimen. This prevents a false signal being emitted due to helium rising at a leak above where the current test is being conducted. The upward flow of helium can be interrupted however by air currents. In cleanrooms with laminar gas flow from the ceiling to the floor the working direction is reversed.
  • Excessive amounts of the test gas should not be sprayed, as this can increase the concentration of helium in the ambient air. This results in an increased background signal in the leak detector and growing insensitivity during the test.
  • If the backing pump of the leak detector used or an auxiliary pump are oil-lubricated, then helium accumulates in the exhaust space in the backing pump and dissolves in the oil, and can diffuse back to the high vacuum area from this point. After detecting high leak rates, the use of gas ballast in the backing pump can help to discharge accumulated helium from the pump system and reduce the background signal that is indicated.

In the vacuum method, it is necessary to generate a sufficiently low vacuum to allow the leak detector to be operated at maximum sensitivity. Otherwise the leak detector will still indicate residual helium from the pumped-down ambient air.

Additional vacuum pumps (auxiliary pumps) with high pumping speeds must therefore often be used for large test specimens. In this case, the leak detector should be connected directly to the recipient pump ports for the large vacuum pump, i.e. parallel to the auxiliary pump.

When the auxiliary pump is running, the partial flow ratio of the system must be defined by measuring with a test leak in order to determine the leakage rate. Only through measuring is it possible to reliably indicate what proportion of the escaping test gas is pumped down by the auxiliary pump and what proportion can be detected in the leak detector.

When working with the sniffer probe, the pressure in the vessel must be at least 100 hPa higher than the ambient pressure. Due to the natural helium content of the air, the sensitivity of the sniffer method is lower than that of the vacuum method. Moreover, the delayed reaction of the leak detector to the inflowing helium must also be taken into consideration. The response time is also dependent on the length of the sniffer probe used.

Leak testing with helium or another test gas does not necessarily have to be carried out with the parameters that are decisive for the specification. Conversions are possible, for example, for various gases, gases and fluids, different pressure conditions, mass leak rates and volume leak rates, etc.

7.3.2 Comparison of test results with leak detector and quadrupole mass spectrometer

Quadrupole mass spectrometers are primarily used to analyze the composition of gas mixtures. They require test pressures in the high vacuum range. Mass spectrometers can be used with almost any tracer gas, as their use does not necessarily depend on the classic tracer gas helium. Residual gas analyzers can detect leaks in a vacuum system without any special test gas. They analyze the mass of the gases in the air.
Leak detectors for the tracer gas helium are not currently designed on the basis of quadrupole mass spectrometers. Their greater robustness and long-term stability as well as the easier quantification of results and data interpretation have resulted in the fact that above all mass spectrometric detectors on the basis of magnetic sector mass spectrometer are mainly used for this purpose.
Units with detectors based on a quartz window sensor are used too for applications which do not require the superior sensitivity of mass spectrometric detectors. Units with quartz window sensors make it possible to work at very high test pressures and high water vapor exposure.